data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/759f2/759f21138aab629b69a5081bce607923e52b53a3" alt="Lawandorder01.jpg"
In chapter 1, Dr. Jones lays out what he calls a “Research and Reasoning Cycle” for genealogy. In this cycle, he states that research and proof are distinct elements and that analysis and proof is something that is done after the research is completed. This caused a bit of discussion as most people feel that they do the analysis and proof while they are doing the research. In fact, it is this very analysis that helps guide the research (where should I look next?).
I don’t think Dr. Jones’ means to dissuade anyone from thinking through their hypotheses while they research. I don’t think he was referring to that type of analysis. I think his approach is more like an episode of Law & Order.