This is the third part of a series on my study into St. Croix marriages. In Part 1, I described what made me undertake this study. In Part 2, I discussed my methodology and results. For this part, I digress slightly and look at the change in baptismal rates over the period.
From my article on Religion in St. Croix 1841-1911, I saw that the latter half of the 19th century showed a significant conversion from Moravian to Anglican, already the most popular religion on the island. Since I expected to see a rapid growth in population on the island, I expected to see a corresponding growth in Anglican baptisms throughout the period. Wrong on both counts.
The chart below shows the numbers of baptisms at St. John’s Anglican Episcopal Church in Christiansted, St Croix, the largest church on the island over the 94 years I studied.
Number of Baptisms by year at St John’s Anglican church from 1841-1934
As you see from the graph, the annual baptismal rate peaked between 1871-1873 at about 253 per year and fell continuously to 1934 with only 25 baptisms recorded in that church. The gap from 1855-1856 is from the set of heavily damaged records which I omitted. The low values in 1854 and 1867 are due to partial year counts surrounding these damaged records. Since Anglicans dominated the population, this suggests that the population didn’t grow as it did in the continental US.
There are a couple of contributors to this trend. First, families became smaller. As in the US, the numbers of children born per couple dropped significantly throughout this period. While early St Croix censuses showed very large households, both urban and rural, later documents show small households. Here are the families in my direct line, by generation, with the numbers of known children and the years of child bearing. The generation numbers are from my Ahnentafel Report.
Numbers of Children by Generation 1759-1940
Generation | Couple | Years | Children |
8 | Claudius and Gertruyd | 1759-1780 | 7 |
7 | Johannis and Amey McNobney | 1790-1817 | 14 |
6 | Johannes and Mary Quickly | 1827-1854 | 16 |
5 | Claudius and Adelaide | 1857-1861 | 3 |
4 | Hester and Andreas | 1887-1893 | 7 |
3 | Ludvig and Olga | 1940 | 1 |
Dear Dave,
ReplyDeleteThe Panama Canal may have been a significant factor in the loss of population (especially male). This is from a Danish website:
"From the 1870s and for the rest of the Danish period economic conditions worsened. Each year there was a substantial deficit in the public budgets of Saint Croix, as well as those of Saint Thomas with Saint Jan. The deficits had to be met by the Danish state. At the same time the population decreased slowly but surely from 38,000 in 1870 to only 26,000 in 1917. The decrease was partly caused by high mortality due to illness, bad housing conditions etc., and partly by emigration. While the Danish West Indies in the early nineteenth century had attracted many immigrants from throughout the region, the situation had become the opposite by the close of that century when emigration from the Danish West Indies was predominant as a response to inequitable land distribution and industrial down-sizing. Many Virgin Islanders found work cutting sugar cane in other islands in the Caribbean, or as seamen, or were recruited for work in constructing the Panama Canal."
The website is: http://www.virgin-islands-history.dk/eng/vi_hist.asp
That's a very interesting point. I have some evidence that relatives and associates did, indeed, leave the island for work building the canal. Seems unemployment was a major driver. With the closing of Hovensa, it may yet be again.
ReplyDelete